Female hybristophilia: Porn Featuring Violence Against Women Is More Popular Among Women Than Men

domestic-violence

Human sexuality is quite complicated when you consider gamuts of things people are attracted to sexually but fortunately for us the advent of technology in rapidly changing times, in its iconoclastic fashion, has been very instrumental in illuminating sexual instincts in us which may have been too taboo or unpopular if expressed decades ago.  Female hybristophilia, the female attraction to violence, has been well discussed in the MGTOW sphere.  For reference, check out Bar Bar’s brilliant video on Hybristophilia (Link below).  Since intelligentsia in academia, people who should have an honest scientific approach to education and exploration, are too tepid to deeply study human sexuality and explore these hard controversial topics, we are left with no other choice as thinking men than to do the job ourselves.  In the words of Barbarossa, welcome to the age of crowd science, gentlemen.

Female attraction to violence, if studied closely, has been apparent for quite some time, whether it’s women’s incessant preference for the mindless brute, the bad boy, the empty “alpha male” jock, violent offenders in prison, serial killers on death row, or in their malevolent utilization of the state and the government in what could be called violence by proxy to hand out punishment to men whenever men “get out of line.”  To say nothing of the effect this demented mentality is presently having on the human population, it elucidate plainly the female irrevocable nature that not only seeks chaos but is infatuated with it.  The more violent and brutal the man is or seem, the more appealing and irresistible he is to the infantilized female mind.  This infatuation with violence, however, has its roots in biology.  Homo Sapiens would not have had such evolutionary success had gender roles not strictly defined or adhered to.  In order to propagate the species in this unforgiving environment humans found themselves natural selection must select for the biggest and the powerful.  The bands in hunter gather days would’ve died off had they catered to the weakest among them, namely the old and the sick.  Women, even though relatively weak themselves, are blessed with the fortunate task to vessel human progenies thereby propagating the human species.  However, unlike other species of animals with shorter duration of pregnancy and could birth multiple babies at once, the human female has to carry a pregnancy for 9 months of which she is completely helpless or limited, and usually could only birth 1 child at a time.  Throughout this 9 months and the years beyond of which she has to nurse the baby, she’s merely a burden on the man and the foraging band.  This necessitates having a man who is physically capable of providing for her, himself, and other kids during times as this.  This is the way it has been throughout human history, through the hunter gather days, through the agricultural revolution, through cognitive revolution, through the industrial revolution, and so on.

However, nature smiled back at humans perhaps for the first time in human history and augment modernity with a leap so vast that human evolutionary process is unable to keep up with it.  As a result, modern times, with its rich scientific and technological advancement, do not require this antiquated evolutionary process mainly because securing survival in modernity isn’t based on one’s physical acumen.  Selecting for brute power is utterly useless to human evolution in modern times and its sole utilization as a deciding mating factor could only impede human progression and may soon destroy civilization.  Modern civilization wasn’t brought about by the men women would typically prefer because women are anti-intellect, civilization was put into gear by the brain and the mind, by the individual men whose intellectual prowess is beyond comprehension.  As much as I hate using this terms because they are demeaning to men, these aforementioned men are indeed the true “alpha males” in every sense of those words.

But you ask, why then do women’s primitive mental faculty still prefers this primitive behavior in men when modernity doesn’t require it?  Well, I theorize that unlike men the female mind never truly evolved.  Environmental pressure is what forces evolution; it’s what forces the human mind to carve a new pattern and new ways of thinking in order to ensure survival.  Man’s mind isn’t new to such changing unpredictability of a harsh environment since they are the ones to go out and exist in it and harness it to ensure their survival.  Comparatively, women are afforded the costly luxury of bypassing these environmental pressures.  Since they are the weak gender nature dictates they should be catered for, by fathers, brothers, husbands, and sons, and because of this, they remain perpetual children in mind.  Regression or stagnation of their mental faculty is mostly due to the absence of these environmental pressures.  Evidence of this could be glimpsed from all major creation and inventions throughout history.  It all happened out of the beauty of man’s mind.  Men create and build civilization, women simply exist in it.

Since their primitive minds abound it is not hard to understand their infatuation with the primitive male, and the best deciding factor in selecting this trait is the male propensity for violence.  To test it out, if she’s unable to accurately measure it in him any other way, she’d be willing to use herself as the subject of his provocation.  She’d shit-test him to see how far she could push before he puts her in her place.   If he strikes her, shows uncaring attitude towards her, give her the blue eye, stiff-arm her, beat the shit out of her, she’d love him more and more.  How many times have you heard stories of domestic abuse where no matter how violent the man is with the woman, she returns to him?  The more violent he is, the more primitive he is, the more she loves him.  Serial killer, rapist, kidnapper Ted Bundy whose targeted group are mostly women had numerous letters in prison penned and sent by women professing their undying love for him.  Imagine that – the crime of one of the most violent offenders in history not only became nothing in women’s minds at the immediate thought of this man’s propensity for violence, it became the source of their guilty pleasure.  Hence the popular saying, the female knows no justice.

To get an accurate understanding of how pervasive this phenomenon of female attraction to violence is, one study that came out earlier this month done by gathering data from google search engine concludes that porn featuring violence against women is more popular among women than among men.

The popular feminist narrative would have you believe that porn is largely consumed by men, and that depictions of violent — or at least rough — sex would be a primarily male-dominated interest.

This is untrue, states researcher Seth Stephens-Davidowitz, who says that porn featuring violence against women is significantly more popular among women compared to men.

His findings might explain the popularity of the BDSM-heavy “Fifty Shades of Grey” series of novels among female readers.

Speaking to Vox in an interview about how Google data proves that most Americans lie about their sexual preferences, the researcher and author of “Everybody Lies” asserts that more women enjoy the genre compared to male porn watchers — despite common sense and politically correct claims to the contrary.

“Porn featuring violence against women is also extremely popular among women,” said the author. “It is far more popular among women than men.”

too_much_drink_810_500_55_s_c1

Increíble.  The gender that cries and decries violence against their own watches more porn with violence against their gender than the gender they demonize as the perpetrator of violence against them.  The reason the above data is more reliable than any other existing data is that Google’s data is aggregated from the search terms people uses versus self-reporting which eradicates the question of ingenuity that comes with gathering such data through surveys or random questioning.  Each week, millions of users around the world search for porn featuring violence against women and most of these users are reported to be women.  It’s like watching women in their natural state.  You can’t get any more reliable than this and it lends credence to years of observational data on the subject.  Welcome to female hybristophilia.

Bar Bar video on Hybristophilia

 

Cheong, I. M. (2017, July 05). Google Researcher: Porn Featuring Violence Against Women Is More Popular Among Women Than Men. Retrieved July 25, 2017, from http://dailycaller.com/2017/07/05/google-researcher-porn-featuring-violence-against-women-is-more-popular-among-women-than-men/?utm_content=bufferf84db&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer

3 thoughts on “Female hybristophilia: Porn Featuring Violence Against Women Is More Popular Among Women Than Men

  1. ♂ (As a suggestion, It might be better to either blur the nudity or change/remove picture, so the article lasts much longer.) I’m going to try to make this go viral. ¶ I know it’s strange, & it’s hard for me to study this kind of stuff because I have major triggers from all the times I’ve been stabbed in the back, I still have doubts about the evo.-psyche interpretation of the female attraction to belligerent sexuality. There’s another aspect that makes me believe it has something to do with something else & greed for novelty & just their essence is/was, of it’s core, different. It’s just so bizarre that males have changed throughout evolution, & that the primitive aspect was a way to “get it out of some men’s systems,” yet females are still pretty barbarians with cute voices, & the other axioms are that women are supposed to follow males. As the data from the article, ‘Google Researcher: Porn Featuring Violence Against Women Is More Popular Among Women Than Men’ states: it isn’t correlated to the way women are treated, call me religious, I just think there’s something inherently evil about female psychology that has been wiped & made obscure from history. for a lack of a better description. ♂

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s